Solarworld
No recent recordsSolar installer based in California · active in 3 states · installer record #11715 resolved from 15 public installation records.
Track record
Install volume by year
Bars: recorded installs · right column: this installer's median $/W that year.
Latest records
Most recent recorded installs
| Date | Location | Size | Price | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 | Hillsborough, NJ | 1,992.5 kW | — | Host-owned · battery |
| Dec 18, 2014 | Oak Bluffs, MA | 5.5 kW | $20,590 | Third-party |
| Apr 21, 2014 | Bakersfield, CA | 4.8 kW | — | Host-owned |
| Feb 5, 2014 | Sanger, CA | 5.4 kW | — | Host-owned |
| Dec 21, 2013 | Bakersfield, CA | 7.4 kW | — | Host-owned |
| Sep 30, 2013 | Bakersfield, CA | 8.6 kW | — | Host-owned |
| Sep 17, 2013 | Bakersfield, CA | 6.5 kW | — | Host-owned |
| Aug 30, 2013 | Bakersfield, CA | 6.8 kW | — | Host-owned |
| Jul 26, 2013 | Bakersfield, CA | 7 kW | — | Host-owned |
| Jul 25, 2013 | Bakersfield, CA | 10 kW | — | Host-owned |
Service geography
Busiest cities
Record
- Installer ID
- PC-11715
- First recorded install
- Oct 16, 2001
- Last recorded install
- Jul 18, 2016
- Priced records
- 4
Is this your company?
Installers will be able to claim this profile, correct records and add licensing, NABCEP credentials and service details. Create a free account to be ready when claims open.
Frequently asked questions
How many solar installations has Solarworld completed?
The Tracking the Sun dataset records 15 installations by Solarworld, from Oct 16, 2001 to Jul 18, 2016, totalling 2.1 MW of capacity. Dataset coverage varies by state, so actual totals may be higher.
What does Solarworld charge for solar?
The median installed price across 4 priced systems is $7.14/W pre-incentive (median system 6.8 kW, ≈ $19,520). Third-party-owned (lease/PPA) share: 7%.
Where does Solarworld install solar?
Recorded installs span 3 states, led by California (13), Massachusetts (1), New Jersey (1).
Dataset updated . Source: LBNL Tracking the Sun public dataset; installer resolved by exact-normalized name matching.